On aproaches to thinking of God

Lately, I've been thinking about my approach to thinking of God. As I see it, there's two ways of tackling such an important issue: put It on the back-burner, or chase after It consciously. Both are valid, yet... I feel as if both are lacking.

The train of thought with putting Brahman on the back-burner is simple. If you've got the Divine on your mind all the time, somewhere, then it'll spread and begin to control your thoughts, impulses, speech, behavior, and so on. It doesn't take much effort, can be practiced at any time, and helps desegregate devotion time from every other time. However, it's a fine line between simmering on the back-burner and off. I've come to realize, the hard way, that this method is insufficient, for the simple reason that you forget things. By definition, you shouldn't notice anything on your mental back-burner, so you shouldn't notice when it's working, going bad, or has gone MIA. As such, you won't notice you've gone astray until there's a major wake-up call.

The opposite is actively thinking on Divinity. It remedies the draw-backs of the back-burner method, but isn't flawless. It takes effort and time to think about and meditate upon God, which means it's detrimental to whatever else you're doing. While that's great for monks in the middle of the Himalayas, it isn't so great for those of us with a 9 to 5 job. After all, we're paid to work, not meditate. Additionally, I feel it tends to create a mental segregation. "Now is work-time," "Now is relax-time," "Now is worship time," and so on, which is exactly what we're trying to get away from.

I'm starting to ramble now, so I'm gonna cut it off for now. But it'll be interesting to see what balance I strike between these two ways of keeping God on my mind.

Naa Varain!

Exams

Ugh. Exam-time. I've got exams in research (which is really just a dumbed down version of statistics) tomorrow, and the day after I have my Calc exam. Unfortunately, I'm not all that confident in my abilities. :/

Ah well, worse that can happen is I bomb them and don't get into Uni. Not so bad, right?

On Christianity

Ah, long time no see. It's been... what? 2, 3 months since I've posted anything? Well, life's slowing down, so it's time to rectify that.

Christianity is... an interesting religion. On one hand, it's theology is riddled with holes and contradictions, and yet it still manages to persist to this day. Why is this? Well, let's explore why.

Christianity has a very unique mind-set. Every faith believes that it's the correct one and will argue that theirs is the best till the cows come home, so it's not unique in that fact. What makes it unique is that Christians will attempt to convert non-believers. ISKON non-withstanding, they're the only ones who will actively seek out new members.

Even so, if it's such a flawed faith, why do people convert and/or stay? Well, that's the second-half of the mindset. Christianity is very much grounded in emotion. Yes, they have a theology, but for the most part everything is subjective. Missionaries often make converts during times of stress or high emotion, which is typically when rational/deeper thoughts are absent.

Once the individual accepts the faith, it's a self-enforcing loop. If they question God, then they're met with stiff resistance. They're told that God is not to be questioned, and that they need to repent of that sin. Doesn't matter what the person's point or question is, it's just swept away in another flood of emotional witnessing. Assuming the other person doesn't simply cast the believer's questions or concerns away, the individual is simply flooded with a spur-of-the-moment guilt. I've seen it happen happen previously. I've e-mailed a pastor with a list of theological loop-holes and contradictions. Several weeks later, he went through that very same list, almost word for word, and said that they don't matter. His argument was that God was merciful, and that you shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth. That we were spoiled brats for gaining salvation, yet questioning the All-Mighty God. People's reactions were exactly what he expected them to be: guilt, followed by a greater adherence to Christ, regardless of those contradictions.

Another mark against Christianity is it's holy text, the bible. I'm 100% certain that it contains Truth at some level, but it's deeply buried. It's full of contradictions, unanswered questions, and seemingly arbitrary edicts.  Of course, one cannot really hold that against the bible. It's been written across several centuries, by many authors, in many languages, and edited by countless hands. However, even the simple-minded realize that because of this, the bible as-is is largely unfit for it's current usage and purpose. Even so, a re-write, or at least a condensation are not forthcoming.

I suppose I've been fairly critical of the faith, so some positive points are in order. What does the faith do right? Well, the one that jumps to mind is that it's simple. You suck, God's great, only way to not-suck and meet God is to love Jesus. It's short, simple, and understandable to basically everyone. That means everyone, even the simplest, is able to love and worship God to the best of their abilities.

That's all the rambling I'll be doing for tonight. Hopefully, I'll be able to post more reguraly than once every few months!

Naa Varain!

Rest in Peace, Swami

I received news not 10 minutes ago that Sathya Sai Baba has left us. His body died, presumably of heart-related troubles. I won't know the details until the official announcement is released.

For those of you who don't know, Sathya Sai Baba is my guru. He is the second incarnation of the Kali Yuga Avatar, successor to Shirdi Sai Baba. In roughly a decade, Prema Sai, the third and final incarnation, will be born, and will lead humanity into a final golden age.

That's who He was to everybody. To me, He was my teacher, my friend, my source of inspiration. He gave me hope and joy, and was always there. My only regret is that He didn't live long enough for me to go see him on pilgrimage.

I actually don't know what to feel right now. He's gone, but not gone. I feel like crying for Him, but at the same time I know He's right here. My world's been torn to pieces, but nothing's really changed. I'm in an odd position right now, and haven't a clue as to what I'm supposed to feel.

I know it's strange, but a small part of me hopes He'll come back tomorrow. Given the time-zone differences, He died exactly at Midnight on Easter. I know it might only be coincidence, but I hope from the bottom of my heart of hearts that it isn't.

I'm back!

नमस्ते everybody! I'm finally home from Costa Rica, and everything's starting to settle down now. So I'll be able to get back into posting a bit more regularly.

First, a personal update: I finally got my hands on the Gita! It's a beautiful copy. It's page edges are gold-leafed, and the inside has sanskrit verses and their transliterations on the left, and on the right is the english translation. I'm gonna start reading it soon, so I can set a reasonable schedule for myself.

Speaking of sanskrit, I'm also going to be teaching myself how to read and speak it. It's gonna take YEARS, but I don't mind.

Also, if anybody's interested in a particular topic, please feel free to request a post on it in my comments!

Naa Varain!

On Atheists

Hello everybody, I'm dropping by to make another post. Hopefully this'll herald my return to the blog-world! (or it's just a 4am motivation thing.) Either way, here it goes.


The term "Atheist" is usually met with a certain level of disgust from theological circles. They're viewed as enemies of God, as unenlightened fools, a waste of a soul, and what have you. But... are they? Are they really just selfish wastes of space, or are they a necessary force?

First, let's define what an Atheist is. The stock definition is "One who doesn't believe in God." However, practicing Buddhists would fall under this label, lumped together with the people who crusade against Christianity. Obviously, this definition needs a bit of revision. The one I've settled on is "One who says this world is all that there was, is, and will ever be." This definition keeps the trappings of Atheists (no afterlife, no God, no soul, et al) yet excludes any nihilistic faiths, such as Buddhism.

Because Atheists don't have any authority besides materialistic ones, they act as they please. Some indulge whimsically in illicit sex, carnivorous delights, mind-altering substances, and so on. They have no reason for helping somebody other than the rewards such an action would promise and the feel-good mood our baser, socialistic programming grants. That's more or less the image conjured up by the word "Atheist," and they've been described as "toxic," "evil," and "demonic."

Sadly, an Atheist's good qualities are often overlooked, due to their demonization. What people either miss or ignore is their dedication to reason and logic. To them, next to nothing is taken on faith. Everything must have a logical and sound basis and understanding. How's that relevant to Suras? Well, it's simple. Atheists provide a check against ideological corruption. Take, for example, the desi-centric nature of Hinduism. Yes, the events and myths recorded do take place in India. Yes, the Vedas are written in Sanskrit, and the culture is firmly rooted in the region's native customs. There is absolutely nothing wrong with those facts. However, there is a not-so-small segment of society that has taken it a step too far. They've declared Hinduism to be an ethnically-exclusive faith. If you aren't a full-blood, born Indian, then you're excluded from the blessings and teachings of Hinduism. The best a non-Indian can hope for is to hit the karma jack-pot and be born as an Indian. You may think I'm kidding, but I'm not. They have an entire racial/spiritual hierarchy mapped out (With them sitting on top of it all, of course!).

So, how do Atheists have any relevance? Shouldn't disciples be able to challenge them, and tear down such an abomination? Well, they should. But they don't. It's a sad thing to see, but some non-Indian Hindus actually willingly subscribe to this backwards system. Their position as a devotee clouds their minds, so they never think to challenge the unfair system. Atheists aren't hampered by any such bias. Using a few logical, well-thought-out arguments, they easily topple such a barbaric system. Similarly, they do the same "cleansing" process for nearly everything else they come into contact with. They'll find something and argue and question it, which forces a devotee to respond with something more than simple blind belief. Some things are easy to answer, such as the caste system, but others are a lot more profound, such as trying to explain how Krishna, Kali, and a rock are really all the same. By virtue of having such a fundamental conviction questioned, reasoned through, and vocalized, the devotee learns more about themselves, their faith, and ultimately God.

So, all in all, Atheists are a mixed bag of nuts. You certainly have the Demons who take full advantage of immunity to divine retribution, but at the same time you have the nice ones, who are nicer than some "Theists," and actually help spread Dharma and faith with their gentle questioning and dedication to reason.

Well, that's all for tonight.

Naa Varain!

I'm still alive

I apologize for my lack of posts. I've got alot of work to make-up from my robotics field trip, so time's pretty valuable. But fear not! I'll get back to posting regularily after all my work's caught up.

Naa Varain